Documents the HWM API in architecture.md and surfaces it in
README.md's feature list. Includes the auto-bump pattern, the
multi-tenant convention (each tosser registers as a named user
in the same lastread file), and the per-format coverage map.
Coverage decisions for 0.3.x:
JAM -- native (.JLR) [shipped 0.3.0]
Squish -- native (.SQL) [shipped 0.3.1]
MSG / PKT -- spec has no HWM, returns -1 [structural]
PCBoard -- USERS file too entangled, deferred
Wildcat -- WC SDK exposes only per-message MarkMsgRead,
no per-user HWM primitive; defer until either
the SDK gains the call or we reverse-engineer
the user-conference state file
Hudson -- LASTREAD.BBS is per-(user, board) and the
GoldBase base instance doesn't carry board context;
EzyCom needs API design before impl
For deferred formats, GetHWM honestly returns -1 and the caller
falls back to its own state (e.g. NR's dupedb keyed by area).
This matches the "no fakery" principle: don't pretend a format
supports HWM when it doesn't, and don't silently sidecar in a
location consumers can't discover.
The 0.3.0 / 0.3.1 trio gives NetReader native HWM coverage for
the two formats that account for the overwhelming majority of
real-world FidoNet areas (JAM, Squish). Everything else falls
back to dupedb.
No code changes in this commit -- docs only.
8.6 KiB
fpc-msgbase — architecture
Layers
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Caller (BBS, tosser, editor, importer, …) │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ma.api (TMessageBase, factory, TUniMessage) │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ma.events ma.lock ma.paths │
│ ma.batch (concurrent tosser helper) │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Format backends — one .pas per format │
│ ma.fmt.hudson ma.fmt.jam ma.fmt.squish │
│ ma.fmt.msg ma.fmt.pkt ma.fmt.pcboard │
│ ma.fmt.ezycom ma.fmt.goldbase ma.fmt.wildcat │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ RTL: TFileStream, BaseUnix/Windows for locking │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Polymorphism
Every backend descends from TMessageBase and implements the abstract
DoOpen, DoClose, DoMessageCount, DoReadMessage, DoWriteMessage
contract. Callers can either:
- Use the unified API —
MessageBaseOpen(format, path, mode)returns aTMessageBase. Read/write throughTUniMessage. Format-agnostic. - Drop down to format-specific class methods (e.g.
TJamBase.IncModCounter,TSquishBase.SqHashName) when they need behaviour the unified API cannot express. Each backend keeps its rich API public.
TUniMessage — two-area model
TUniMessage = record
Body: AnsiString; { only the message text }
Attributes: TMsgAttributes; { everything else, key/value }
end;
Two areas, no surprises:
- Body carries the user-visible message text and nothing else. Never kludge lines, never headers, never SEEN-BY/PATH. Always a ready-to-display blob.
- Attributes carries every other piece of data: From, To,
Subject, dates, addresses, attribute bits, FTSC kludges (MSGID,
ReplyID, PID, SEEN-BY, PATH, …), and per-format extras
(
jam.msgidcrc,squish.umsgid,pcb.confnum, …).
Same model as RFC 822 email (headers + body). Lossless round-trip
across Read → Write → Read is enforced by the regression suite in
tests/test_roundtrip_attrs.pas.
The library never composes presentation. A BBS that wants to
display kludges inline walks Attributes and prepends ^aMSGID:
etc. to its own display. A BBS that hides kludges just shows
Body. A tosser that needs MSGID for dupe detection reads
Attributes.Get('msgid') directly — no body parsing required.
Dates land in TDateTime regardless of how the backend stored
them (Hudson MM-DD-YY strings with 1950 pivot, Squish FTS-0001
strings, JAM Unix timestamps, PCBoard / EzyCom DOS PackTime).
Stored in attributes as date.written / date.received via
SetDate / GetDate.
Format-specific bit fields (Hudson byte attr, JAM 32-bit attr,
Squish attr, MSG word attr, PCB status, EzyCom dual byte) are
unrolled into individual attr.* boolean attributes on Read via
UniAttrBitsToAttributes and recomposed on Write via
UniAttrBitsFromAttributes and the per-format XxxAttrFromUni
helpers. The canonical MSG_ATTR_* cardinal bitset stays as the
internal pivot.
High-Water Mark (HWM) — per-user scanner pointer
Tossers, scanners, and editors that want to track "last message I
processed for user X" can use the per-user HWM API on
TMessageBase:
function SupportsHWM: boolean;
function GetHWM(const UserName: AnsiString): longint;
procedure SetHWM(const UserName: AnsiString; MsgNum: longint);
procedure MapUser(const UserName: AnsiString; UserId: longint);
property ActiveUser: AnsiString; { auto-bump on Read }
HWM uses the format's native lastread mechanism, not a sidecar.
A tosser registers itself as just another user ('NetReader',
'Allfix', 'FidoMail-Toss') and its HWM lives in the same
file the BBS uses for human-user lastread, so multiple consumers
naturally coexist without colliding.
Coverage:
| Format | HWM | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| JAM | ✓ | .JLR (CRC32(lower(name))) |
| Squish | ✓ | .SQL (CRC32(lower(name))) |
| Hudson, GoldBase, EzyCom | — | LASTREAD.BBS/DAT per-user-id, per-board — deferred |
| Wildcat | — | SDK exposes MarkMsgRead per-message but no per-user HWM primitive |
| PCBoard | — | USERS file lastread per-conference; deferred |
| MSG, PKT | — | spec has no HWM concept |
For unsupported formats SupportsHWM returns false and GetHWM
returns -1; SetHWM is a no-op. Caller falls back to its own
state for those formats (e.g. NR's dupedb).
Auto-bump pattern for scanners:
base.ActiveUser := 'NetReader';
for i := 0 to base.MessageCount - 1 do begin
base.ReadMessage(i, msg);
{ ... process msg ... }
{ HWM auto-tracks the highest msg.num seen for NetReader. }
end;
When ActiveUser is set, ReadMessage calls SetHWM after each
successful read if the just-read msg.num is strictly greater
than the current HWM. Never decrements -- reading a lower-numbered
message is a no-op. Default off (ActiveUser = '').
Multi-tenant by design: every scanner / tosser gets its own
slot in the lastread file, keyed by its name. NR as 'NetReader',
Allfix as 'Allfix', Fimail as 'FidoMail-Toss' -- they all
coexist in .JLR / .SQL without interfering with each other or
with human-user lastread.
Pack/purge is the format's responsibility: each backend's Pack rewrites the lastread file in step with the message renumbering. For JAM and Squish this is handled natively.
Capabilities API — backend self-description
Each backend declares the canonical list of attribute keys it understands via a class function:
class function TMessageBase.ClassSupportedAttributes: TStringDynArray;
Callers query before setting:
if base.SupportsAttribute('attr.returnreceipt') then
RenderReceiptCheckbox
else
HideReceiptCheckbox;
Backends silently ignore unknown attributes on Write (RFC 822
X-header semantics — fine for forward compatibility); the
capabilities API exists so callers know in advance which keys won't
survive on a given format. The full per-format support matrix lives
in docs/attributes-registry.md.
Locking
Three layers, applied in order on every Open:
- In-process —
TRTLCriticalSectionperTMessageBaseinstance. - Cross-process — advisory lock on a sentinel file
(
<base>.lckor, for Squish,<base>.SQLso we coexist with other Squish-aware tools).fpflock(LOCK_EX|LOCK_SH)on Unix,LockFileExon Windows. Retry with backoff up to a configurable timeout (default 30s). Lock acquire/release fires events. - OS share modes —
fmShareDenyWritefor writers,fmShareDenyNonefor readers, matching DOS-era multi-process sharing conventions every classic format expects.
Events
TMessageEvents lets callers subscribe one or more handlers to receive
metBaseOpened, metMessageRead, metMessageWritten, metLockAcquired,
metPackProgress, etc. Internally the dispatcher serialises calls so
handlers do not need to be reentrant.
Concurrent tossers
TPacketBatch owns a queue of .pkt paths and a worker thread pool.
Each worker opens its packet, reads messages, hands each to the
caller-provided processor. The batch caches one TMessageBase per
destination area so writes serialise through layer-1 locking; layer-2
keeps separate processes (e.g. an editor) safe at the same time.
Behavioural fidelity
Every format backend is implemented from the published format
specification (FTSC documents and the original format authors' own
spec papers — see docs/ftsc-compliance.md). Tests read and write
real sample bases captured from working BBS installations; round-trip
tests verify byte-for-byte preservation across read → write → read
cycles.