Merged latest FreeTDM code from Sangoma's repo

Merge remote branch 'smgfs/master'

Conflicts:
	build/modules.conf.in
	configure.in
	libs/esl/fs_cli.c
	libs/freetdm/mod_freetdm/mod_freetdm.c
	libs/freetdm/src/ftmod/ftmod_sangoma_isdn/ftmod_sangoma_isdn.h
	libs/freetdm/src/ftmod/ftmod_sangoma_isdn/ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cfg.c
	libs/freetdm/src/ftmod/ftmod_sangoma_ss7/ftmod_sangoma_ss7_logger.c
	libs/freetdm/src/ftmod/ftmod_sangoma_ss7/ftmod_sangoma_ss7_support.c
	src/include/switch_types.h
	src/mod/applications/mod_commands/mod_commands.c
	src/mod/applications/mod_spandsp/mod_spandsp.c
	src/mod/endpoints/mod_opal/mod_opal.cpp
	src/mod/endpoints/mod_opal/mod_opal.h
	src/mod/endpoints/mod_sofia/mod_sofia.h
	src/mod/endpoints/mod_sofia/rtp.c
	src/switch.c
	src/switch_core.c
	src/switch_rtp.c
This commit is contained in:
David Yat Sin
2012-09-12 11:05:39 -04:00
31 changed files with 9223 additions and 911 deletions

View File

@@ -48,9 +48,26 @@ FT_DECLARE(ftdm_status_t) _ftdm_channel_complete_state(const char *file, const c
ftdm_time_t diff = 0;
ftdm_channel_state_t state = fchan->state;
#if 0
/* I could not perform this sanity check without more disruptive changes. Ideally we should check here if the signaling module completing the state
executed a state processor (called ftdm_channel_advance_states() which call fchan->span->state_processor(fchan)) for the state. That is just a
sanity check, as in the past we had at least one bug where the signaling module set the state and then accidentally changed the state to a new one
without calling ftdm_channel_advance_states(), meaning the state processor for the first state was not executed and that lead to unexpected behavior.
If we want to be able to perform this kind of sanity check it would be nice to add a new state status (FTDM_STATE_STATUS_PROCESSING), the function
ftdm_channel_advance_states() would set the state_status to PROCESSING and then the check below for STATUS_NEW would be valid. Currently is not
valid because the signaling module may be completing the state at the end of the state_processor callback and therefore the state will still be
in STATUS_NEW, and is perfectly valid ... */
if (fchan->state_status == FTDM_STATE_STATUS_NEW) {
ftdm_log_chan_ex(fchan, file, func, line, FTDM_LOG_LEVEL_CRIT,
"Asking to complete state change from %s to %s in %llums, but the state is still unprocessed (this might be a bug!)\n",
ftdm_channel_state2str(fchan->last_state), ftdm_channel_state2str(state), diff);
}
#endif
if (fchan->state_status == FTDM_STATE_STATUS_COMPLETED) {
ftdm_assert_return(!ftdm_test_flag(fchan, FTDM_CHANNEL_STATE_CHANGE), FTDM_FAIL,
"State change flag set but state is not completed\n");
ftdm_assert_return(!ftdm_test_flag(fchan, FTDM_CHANNEL_STATE_CHANGE), FTDM_FAIL, "State change flag set but state is already completed\n");
return FTDM_SUCCESS;
}
@@ -87,6 +104,7 @@ FT_DECLARE(ftdm_status_t) _ftdm_channel_complete_state(const char *file, const c
ftdm_assert(!fchan->history[hindex].end_time, "End time should be zero!\n");
fchan->history[hindex].end_time = ftdm_current_time_in_ms();
fchan->last_state_change_time = ftdm_current_time_in_ms();
fchan->state_status = FTDM_STATE_STATUS_COMPLETED;
@@ -262,6 +280,9 @@ static ftdm_status_t ftdm_core_set_state(const char *file, const char *func, int
}
}
if (ftdm_test_flag(ftdmchan, FTDM_CHANNEL_NATIVE_SIGBRIDGE)) {
goto perform_state_change;
}
if (ftdmchan->span->state_map) {
ok = ftdm_parse_state_map(ftdmchan, state, ftdmchan->span->state_map);
@@ -353,6 +374,8 @@ end:
goto done;
}
perform_state_change:
ftdm_log_chan_ex(ftdmchan, file, func, line, FTDM_LOG_LEVEL_DEBUG, "Changed state from %s to %s\n", ftdm_channel_state2str(ftdmchan->state), ftdm_channel_state2str(state));
ftdmchan->last_state = ftdmchan->state;
ftdmchan->state = state;